Type XXIII U-Boats (1944)

Nazi Germany, 980 planned, 61 completed (1944-45)

WW2 U-Boats:

Seeteufel (1944) | Type Ia U-Boats (1936) | Type II U-Boats (1935) | Type IX U-Boats (1936) | Type VII U-Boats (1933) | Type XB U-Boats (1941) | Type XIV U-Boats (1941) | Type XVIII U-Boats (1944) | Type XXI U-Boats (1944) | Type XXIII U-Boats (1944) | German mini-subs and human torpedoes

The true Elektroboot

The Type XXI were large scale production Kriegsmarine’s “wunderwaffe” planned by Nazi Germany at the end of the war. Alongside the smaller Type XXIII “Elektobote” and numerous “midgets” at a stage events verged on desperation, the Type XXIII was also supposed to reverse the situation. Announced as the boldest leap into the future for the Kriegsmarine so far, the world’s most advanced submarine design of their time, The Type XXI would be also a powerful inspiration for all navies in the next decades, and up to the 1957 USS Nautilus. In the end an order for 980, then 280 was down to 61 U-Boats of type completed, commissioned, but only a few had a meaningful operational career, with seven lost in action and a relatively low tonnage sunk. So was it a real game changer in 1945, or just an overblown propaganda effort ? Here’s the detailed answer. #kriesgmarine #uboat #germannavy #ww2 #typeXXIII #walterturbine


BDMS Hecht S-171 in the 1960s, the only sailing Type XXIII in the cold war. She was former sunken U-Boat, U-2367, raised, repaired and modernized, moslty used to rebuilt bot engineering and crew’s skills. This, with the ill-fater sister Hai (S-170) are at the base of cold war German submarine development. They were followed-up by the U-200/201 types (pinterest).

A technological revolution: From submersible to submarine


The move towards “submersibles” to “submarines” was done during WW2, but never realized in practice, despite the fact Nazi Germany tried hard to gather resources for it to happen. The difference was considerable as with the common model, U-Boat Type VIIC that roamed the Atlantic from 1940, was essentially the same model as the WWI mass-produced (92 on 129 planned) Type UB III, which was a simple mid-range model, mass-produced until 1945, surfaced most of the time, only submerging in emergency. The transition towards a “submarine” meant to simplify having greater characteristics to stay and perform better underwater. Doubling the speed and depth to escape escorts, and stay underwater, so undetected for much longer, were the prime objectives. Given the limitations of electric power at the time, it was necessary to forge out looking for a new power source than the traditional diesel-electric.

The conclusion of all reports for losses to the allies were plural in origin: More escorts, more ships to sink (Libery/Victory), better tactics, better detection system, better armament, constant naval aviation patrol, and unbeknownst to the German naval staff, full knowledge of impending attacks thanks to the breaking of the Enigma machine by the Turing computer at Bletchley Park.


Author’s illustration depicting all types, produced, tested and paper projected of German Unterseeboote during the war. Greyed out profile are approximations based on available information, of paper project or submarines started but never completed (like the Type XXV boats). This does not give the scale of production however. Note the Type XXIII scale on the down right corner, below the Type XXI.

But Hitler was convinced by Kark Dönitz, at the head of the Kriegsmarine in 1943, to invest massively in new AIP experiments by Dr. Walter to allow a submarine to be submerged almost indefinitely and thus, having a new “secret weapon” that could turn the tables. In the comparison between the Heer, Luftwaffe and the always “poor child”, the Kriegsmarine, and some help by Albert Speer to set a mass production in 1944 it was hoped to produced two models, one for coastal operations (The Type XXIII) and one for oceanic operations (Type XXI). The latter was a replacement for the now obsolescent Type VII, the former to replace the early Type I, II and III midget U-Boats of the interwar.


Albert Speer, Karl Dönitz and Alfred Jodl in 1945.

Unfortunately Dr.Walter experiments, which led to some excellent results, were in the end not considered worth an adoption in submarines by wartime, as the chemical compounds used were way too volatile and dangerous. A depth charge detonation could have trigerred notably an internal explosion. As development dragged on and without a workable powerplant at hand, Dönitz decided to compromise to launch production, by essentially doubling the battery capacity and keeping trusted diesels, a snorkel, while integrating many other innovations, which, combined with the modular construction, were a lot to manage under constant allied raids over Germany by 1944-45. In the end, only 118 Type XXI were completed over 1,170 planned, and the only two operational achieved nothing during their sorties.

Dönitz however had an “ace” perhaps more appropriate to the war as it evolved after D-Day and the loss of French and Dutch ports. To answer the evolving situation, a two-prone solution was given, using human torpedoes and midget submarines on one hand, provided they could be trucked or brought by rail close to deployment (this too, was a failure), and the new coastal Type XXIII, which had just enough range to leave Baltic ports, cross the Skagerrak and operate in the north sea.

Development


Model of the Type

The German Type XXIII so-called elektroboote (“electric boats”) were designed as cheap, small coastal submarines for shallow waters and not initially limited to the North Sea, but also intended for the Black Sea and Mediterranean, the use of railways and modular assembly being crucial in that strategy. Albeit in great lines they shared the same very large battery power to be faster, and stay longer underwater, they were very rudimentary, lacking all the innovations ported on the Type XXI, and could carry only two spare torpedoes, which in addition could only be loaded externally. Still, engineers worked on improving their streamlining and there was a snorkel, to run on diesels all the way to the deployment area, given the allied air superiority. The Type XXIII was still advanced enough to inspire post-war submarine design, such as the Soviet Quebec class. Indistrial plans were just as ambitious as for the Type XII, with the same elaborated modular construction spread into many sites to avoid bombing, and final assembly in a bunker. Type XXIII boats however arrived also too late, the bulk being cancelled, scrapped incomplete, and just paper projected. There were also plan for even smaller boats (see later). Still, they were more advanced and larger than the Seehund.

Development on the Type XXI U-boat started late 1942, just when it was decided to double on a smaller, cheaper version with the same advanced technology, at first specifically to replace the Type II coastal submarine. Karl Dönitz at the time, as the situation of the axis was still largely, wanted them to operate in the Mediterranean and Black Sea, and for this, rail transport was a necessity. It was already the case for WWI U-Boats. The other obligation as specified was the use of the very same standard 53.3 cm (21 in) torpedo tubes to be able to fire more advanced acoustic/electromagnetic torpedoes that were planned. So even only two torpedoes had far more chances to get a hit.

The development of the Type XXIII was later given higher priority, and Speer revised it to use existing components as much as possible to reduce development time, while Helmut Walter in charge of the project recycled the previous Type XXII prototype’s hull. By 30 June 1943, the design was ready for approval. Construction was setup at several shipyards between Germany, France, Italy and Ukraine all under supervision of the lead contractor Deutsche Werft, in Hamburg.
The major manufacturing challenge was to have them constructed in sections, with a final assembly that was as easy as possible with limited expertise or resources. Modules were to be produced by different subcontractors, in open facilities, and later by mid-1944 from inside mines and other underground facilities. Some foreign yards were given the responsibility to assemble U-2446 to U-2460 at Nikolaev in Southern Ukraine under supervision of the Deutsche Werft yard. They were moved to the Linzner yard as the situation evolved, on 1 May 1944 but later cancelled. In late 1944 construction was entirely concentrated at Germaniawerft, Kiel and Deutsche Werft, Hamburg, the first managing to assemble 51 and Deutsche Werft 49 Type XXIIIs. The initial plan for 980 being dropped and reduced to 280, 61 were completed, commissioned but due to training time, only 6 ever carried out a war patrol. This was better than the Type XXI anyway.

Design of the class

Hull and general design


Open source rendition, creative commons

The Type XXIII had an all-welded single hull, a world’s first, with a fully streamlined outer casing, relatively small conning tower (simplified and les advanced than the Type XXI’s) and she had a fairing housing the Diesel exhaust silencer. He hull “deck” was uncluttered and well shaped for the best underwater speeds, as the straight stem. Walter design did not included no forward hydroplanes as it was believed the aft rudders and blowers were sufficient, but they were added later.
Another simplification was a use of a single three-bladed propeller, one shaft, plus steering via a single rudder. She had a halved machinery compared ti the Type XXI but reused iuts “8” shaped shull anyway, its smaller lower section, difficult to access, housing the very large 62-cell battery. The double cylinder shape for a pressure hull was not surprising as it was the better suited shape to resist pressure.
Eaquipment was barebones. There was a single periscope, a “Bali” radar warning antenna but no radar, no torpedo reloads, and the listening device was simplified with 2×11 membrane receivers, and no active sonar.




























Since original documentation had been burned, the only existing plans are those reconstituted by the Bundesmarine after refloating the two U-Boats later modernized as Hai and Hecht.

Construction and assembly

In order to be ready for rail transportation, the hull was divided in four sections fitting the standard loading gauge of the time, which was the same throughout Europe but not Russia. Sections were tall and carried either vertically between supports, or laid down on the side due to the issue of tunnels. Thus, four sections plus the conning tower were carried, each on their own flatcar. A full train, often added one or two Flak cars of ten plus the locomotive could carry two knocked-on Type XXIII for final assembly wherever necessary.
The fully assembled boat displaced 234 t (258 short tons) surfaced and 258 t (284 short tons) submerged for an overall lenght of 34.68 m (113 ft 9+1⁄2 in), a Beam of 3.02 m (9 ft 11 in) and a Draft of 3.66 m (12 ft). The whole height from keel to conning tower was c7 meters or 23 feet. Each section was roughly eight meters long, compatible with most twin bogie flatcars.

Rough sections were supposed to be assembled in foreign yards, but planned operational space and requirements for transportability changed, so when weight was checked, engineers were alarmed as the completed boats were too heavy and no longer buoyant, due to all the additional equipment required by the Navy. This created significant delays as it was necessary to insert a 2.20 meter long intermediate piece (“Oelfken”) section to just recover this buoyancy, an extension of 1.30 meters. Dönitz wanted to have two reserve torpedoes carried but due to the bow compartment internal loading redesign, creating further delays the shipbuilding commission rejected it. External loading with iron frame and trimming became the norm. Construction costs at Finkenwerder were estimated at 761,721 RM per boat.

Diving performances

The Typ XXIII had a diving depth of 100 meters (2.5 times safety) but a test diving depth of 150 meters and destruction depth, calculated at 250 meters. The pressure hull plating was made of shipbuilding steel St 52 KM, 9.5 mm to 11.5 mm thick but stiffened by 140×7 mm for the flat bead inner frames interleaved between 450 and 550 mm. The St 52 was chosen because ot was easy to weld and became a standard in German submarine construction until the end of the war: It had a yield point of 360 N/mm² and strength of 520 N/mm². The outer hull’s frames and skin were made of lighter St 42 KM, also welded.
The pressure hull consisted of two cylindrical halves placed together at the front and amidships the lower space housing the battery cells (diameter 2.80 m) whereas the living quatters above were inside the 3.00 meters diameter tube. The pressure hull was 22.5 meters long. All diving cells and fuel oil bunkers were located in the outer hull.
From April 1944, an increase in carbon and silicon content of steel St 52 was ordered in order to save manganese. From August 1944, thus, cracks were expected to form during welding after a three-month delay. The order was immediately revoked but not take effect until spring 1945, delayng the whole proghram and casting doubts about the early boats. On October 2nd, after a tour of Germania shipyard, Vice Admiral Friedrich Ruge noted “Poor welding” was visible.

Stresses on the pressure hull when diving were calculated at IBG bye engineers Schubert, Kuhlmann and Wüpper adn they depended on various section, with an empirical coefficient of 0.8 from 25.6 to 28.8 kg/cm². They published a watning on the matter on December 6, 1944 but confidence still, was great for the “8” shape. The calculations were done on a single tube, now two tubes connected together and only a deep diving test chould confirm this. This was done on January 24, 1945, by U 2324 off Norway with special dial gauges recorders and tension wires, plus fully loaded. At 150 meters, cracking noises were heard and she was kept the boat at this depth recoding 7.35 kg/mm³ and the commander refused to go deeper and surfaced. Postwar, U 2326 was lost with its French crew on December 6, 1946 during a deep diving test at 165 meters so beyond a probable destruction depth of 160 meters according to the Lübeck engineering office, which also worked on Hai and U Hecht postwar. The safety depth was set at 65 meters, max test depth at 80 meters.

Powerplant


Since the Walter AIP propulsion was never ready, a rather conservative approach was taken, with the use of one MWM RS134S 6-cylinder diesel engine rated for 575–630 metric horsepower (423–463 kW; 567–621 shp) coupled with an AEG GU4463-8 double-acting electric motor, rated for 580 metric horsepower (427 kW; 572 shp) and for silent apoproach, a BBC CCR188 electric creeping motor, 35 metric horsepower (26 kW; 35 shp). As said aboven there was a 62-cell battery power and the diesel could be exhausted and fed b air coming from an advanced snorkel. The latter was not perfect, and ingested water even in moderately rough seas.
Due to friction losses in the gearbox, reduced to 2.835:1 due to the speed diffencial bertween the diesel/main electric motor and propeller, only 95.5% of engine output was truly passed on to the propeller screw and when running on diesel the absolute down limit was 5 knots due to its sooting.
Top Speed was thus of 9.7 kn (18.0 km/h) surfaced and 12.5 knots (23 km/h) submerged for a 2,600 nmi (4,800 km) at 8 kn (15 km/h) range surfaced and a total of 194 nmi (359 km) at 4 kn (7 km/h) submerged, far enough for approaching dense sea lanes in safety. Test depth was 180 m (590 ft) as calculated. Of course the modules assembly was a crucial factor of strenght, linked to welding skills, but each had its own thick bulkhead.

Snorkel Running

Unlike on the larger Class XXI submarine, the similar snorkel system of the Type XXIII operated well. The diesel engine was large and well fed enough for performance achieved while snorkeling with an intake vacuum 38 mbar, exhaust pressure of 0.35 atm. Both snorkel and periscope were vibration-free at all speeds. Max snorkeling speed was even higher than full surface speed due to the lower resistance encountered, at 10.75 knots. Detection by enemy radar could be reduced to 30% when snorkelling and only 10% whej the snorkel was padded with a special rubber-like covering (“Chimney Sweep”). This coating was developed by Johannes Jaumann with IG Farben by the spring of 1944. Like an onion it was multi-layered with various thicknesses down to the metal wall of the snorkel. In addition individual layers were separated by dielectric support layers having a very low dielectric constant. Radar waves were thus absorbed in depth and became weaker and slower with its energy completely converted into heat. Fortunately, ships had the time had no infrared detection systems. The coating was studied by the allies postwar and called “a radar swamp”, the principle is still used today on modern SSNs. In addition the Type XXIII when snorkelling had detection warning with the pressure-resistant decimeter wave antenna “Bali 1”.
It did not worked on higher-frequency centimeter-wave radars.

But these were problems: This telescopic snorkel needed 27 seconds using compressed air however to be raised and down, and the system was unreliable and very noisy. It had manual backup through. The snorkel head used a float-operated head valve supposed to close automatically when flooded but it was not the case in operation. They failed in specific course in relation to waves directions. In cold water there was no meas to prevent icing as well. Onboard listening device when snorkelling was inoperative due to parasiting diesel noise while in return, the Type XXIII could be detected from 8,000 meters. Captains were instructed to interrupt their run every 20 to 40 minutes just to listen. The submarine then went on by inertia and the diesel was restarted as speed died out after just a minute. So this did not hampered much its course.

Electric silent running

When providing electric power as used as generators the main electric motor was able to deliver 1280 Ampers at 300 volts. When driving at slow speed only on its main electric motor, noise of the main machine gearbox was critical. Thus the use of a creeping motor was necessary depending on the mission. Top speed underwater was geared down 3:1 by a V-belt at 4.8 knots, with a maximum crawl speed sustained at 4.3 kn for 30 hours with a fully charged battery. At 2.5 knots, range reached 215 nautical miles or 398 km.
At almost all speeds achievable with the slow speed drive, these boats were very stealthy, almost impossible to detect with standard acoustic devices of the time in 1944. At a diving depth of 11 meters and from 500 meters of any liseting device, the noise at 120 rpm was less than 26 dB at a water value of 1 µPa unlike airborne sound (20 µPa). Eaquivalent air sound pressure was 0 dB so barely a human sound respiration.
U 2321 achieved 4.8 kn under 20 meters, at 28 kW on shaft, a crawling speed twice as high as the Type VIIC. At max crawl speed cavitation noises spilled the bill, but it was worked out by thickeining the propeller tip edges to the cost of 0.3 kn. This change became standard.

Innovative double Batteries

The battery system comprised two lead accumulator and an innovation, 31 double cells of the 2×21 MAL 740 E/23 type to produced a current between 240 and 120 volts with fewer cells. Each double cell weighted 598 kg and worked at 30°C to generate 2176 Amper for a total capacity of 3264 Ah and 1.5 hours of discharge time or 874 A and 5 hours of discharge time, down to 116 A and 50 hours discharge, average discharge voltage of 2.0 volts per cell for a total of 1.3 megawatt hours. Current consumption was 1960 A in daily operation.
Battery charging started at 980 A up (2.4 volts per cell, 149 volts per half battery) and in the second charging stage down to 245 A/2.4 volts per cell. Third stage it was 245 A to 2.7 volts but fast charging was not recommended due to heat issues. Ventilation was not adequate. Full charging time after full discharge in 3 hours needed 6.75 hours of charge in two stages, the third only be recommended once a week to maintain capacity. They released explosive oxyhydrogen via electrolysis, realing up to 19 m³ of gas per hour when in use, so a working ventilation adjusted to suck out 59 liters of oxyhydrogen mixture were necessary for each battery cell per minute at 245 A.

Performances: Agile but dangerous boats

The Type XXIII as tested in 1944 proved to have excellent handling characteristics. It was highly maneuverable while surface and underwater, and this was all due to Walter’s skills in streamlining it. It was able to crash dive time in just 9 seconds, so enough to escape an incoming aircraft, while its maximum diving depth of 180 metres (98 fathoms) was already more than the shallow waters it was supposed to operate in. While submerged, its top speed fell to 12 and a half knots on average (23 km/h), surfaced 9 knots of 17 km/h so it really was a pure “submarine”. Half-submerged using the snorkel, as the diesel had less capacity, speed was down to ten and a half knots or 19 km/h. Probably 4-5 knots using the creeping motor. These figures were however less impressive than or the Type XXI (17/15 kts).

However it was no all rosy. Indeed the diving time while underway was 14 seconds with a small turning circle, 150 meters regardless of the speed and estimated up to 280 meters depending on the weather. Above-water stability coef. was 0.193 meters and underwater stability 0.329 meters. Trim was however quite sensitive underwater, so much so they had the tendency to break surface after a torpedo was released, revealing its presence. On September 11, 1944, U 2324 during a troubleshooting exercise rammed a sandy seabed at 106 meters.
The diving cells in the lower “8” loop had no flood flaps and were wet by inflitrations in rough seas, so it became necessary to blow them up with compressed air from time to time, constantly checking trim as well. The low reserve displacement was just 10.5% so when water flooded in, they sank quite quickly. The “U Hai” (ex. U 2365) and “U Hecht” (ex. U 2367) showed how much. U 2331 sank off Hela on October 10, 1944 with the entire crew to also demonstrate this. Raised postwar and examined, it was proved to have been reversing and loose control. Massive infiltration completely flooded the cells and U 2331 los control, with only the commander and three bridge officers jumping out of the conning tower and saved.

Also while underwater, the small pressure hull compared to the number of sailors was an issue. The air content was around 130 m³ and with a crew of 14, the CO2 in breathing went to 1.5% after 4.5 hours. Thus, the Type XXIIII carried 400 containers of quicklime for the air purification system to scrap CO2 content and limit it to 1.5% after 5 hours, usable over 83 days. There were also 200 liters of oxygen in bottles at 150 atm, good enough if the boat was trapped at the bottom over 70 hours of three days, still for a crew of 14. It was used when oxygen content fell below 17.5%.

Armament

Due to limited space aboard, the forward bow section being very short had only two torpedo tubes with the torpedoes pre-loaded at port before depoarting. No space for spares. Unlile previous U-Boats which had built-in wells to crane down torpedoes and lead them to the torpedo room, in thzat case the reloading necessitated to ballast the submarine down at the stern, lifting the bow clear of the water while a barge with a simple A frame jack could approach and load the torpedoes directly into the tubes. This operation needed some time and exposition, which given the allied air superiority in 1944, was not easy to obtain. But it required little to no installations, and could be perform anywhere, preferrably at night.

The torpedoes were of the G7e type, TIII, but other models were tested.
The standard torpedo provided to the Type XXIII was the heavy electric torpedo T IIIa FAT 2.
Improvements of the G7e(TII) the III was Introduced in 1942, a vast improvement as its former faulty exploder was replaced by a new design, it had now a range of 7,500 m (8,200 yd) up to 56 km/h (30 kn). Unlike previous models, the TIII was used for day-attacks, with a good proximity feature, so to exploded under the keel of a targeted ship, breaking its back with a single torpedo. For the XXIII and its only two torpedoes, this was the perfect match. The TIII by the time was upgraded to the steering FaT (Flächenabsuchender Torpedo) pattern running systems for convoy attacks. The Type XXIII probably also tested, but not adopoted the LuT (Lagenunabhängiger Torpedo) G7e TIII. The

Other models were tested. Designed and tested as Gothenhafen station (later captured by the Soviets), the T4/5 entered service in 1943 and Weighted at least 3,080 lbs. (1,937 kg), the T10 being 3,571 lbs. (1,620 kg) for 23 ft. 7 in. (7.186 m) in overall lenght. They carried a 440 lbs. (200 kg) warhead filled with Hexanite at 5,470 yards (5,000 m) and 30 knots on T-10 and 6,230 yards (5,700 m) at 24-25 knots for the T11, powered by Lead-acid batteries.
The T10 Spinne (“spider”) was modified to use wire guidance and issued in 1944 but results were not satisfactory and it was not adopted. The T11 Zaunkönig 2 which was less influenced by Foxer (towed noise maker). The earlier T5 Called the original Zaunkönig (wren) was designed to home in on cavitation noise (around 24.5 kHz, props at 10-18 knots). Combat debut was successful in September 1943. The T5b was had a range of 8,750 yards (8,000 m) at 22 knots but according to documentation, if tested also, they were not adopted in service by the Type XXIII.

Completed boats and fate

The first 49 boats (U-2321 to U-2331, and U-2334 to U-2371) were assembled at Deutsche Werft in Hamburg, but the U-2332 and U-2333 were ordered from Friedrich Krupp at Germaniawerft, Kiel. 29 more, U-2372 to U-2400 were ordered from Deutsche Werft yard at Toulon, but 9 were scrapped incomplete, the other never laid down. 60 were ordered aboard, including 30 at Genoa under German occupation, U-2401 to U-2430, 15 at Monfalcone U-2431 to U-2445 and 15 at Nikolaev and Linz (U-2446 to U-2460) all cancelled and never laid down. The next U-2461 to U-2500 were only on paper, they were never ordered.
Later as these foreign yards were no longer available, production swapped to Germany: 100 were ordered to Deutsche Werft and 500 at Hamburg yard (U-4001 to U-4500), 120 ordered and laid down but scrapped incomplete, the remainder all cancelled. 300 were ordered at Kiel (U-4701 to U-5000), 11 (U-4701 to U-4712) built but U-4713 to U-4891 cancelled. U-4892 to U-5000 were only listed; never ordered.

U-2321 was the first launched, at Deutsche Werft (Hamburg) on 17 April 1944. Later joined by six more completed in time for training and operational patrols around the British Isles, by early 1945. 48 more from Deutsche Werft, 14 from Germaniawerft were also completed, prepared for training, but none were truly operational. U-4712 was the last one launched on 1 March 1945 before the city was captured. U-2321, U-2322, U-2324, U-2326, U-2329 and U-2336 were all sunk on patrol while claiming four ships (7,392 gross register tons) but seven were lost in all, by air, mines, ships, or scuttling. That was needless to say, not impressive for the scale and cost of the whole program.

Seehund. This midget type carried exactly the same armament as a Type XXIII, and was far cheaper to produce. It could be also transported by rail on a single flatcar. This emergency midget built by Germaniawerft and Schichau, CRD-Monfalcone and Klöckner-Humboldt-Deutz (Ulm) only measured 12 m long for 1,68 m wide and 17 tons, with an all-electric drive for 7 knots, surfaced 3 knots submerged, 500 km or 310 miles range, crew of two. 1,000 were planned, 285 completed, 138 “active”, 38 lost. Most successful attack was from IJmuiden on 31 December 1944. 142 sorties made until April 1945 and from 93,000 to 120,000 gross tons sunk depending on the sources. This was way more than the Type XXIII, showing that Dönitz could have swapped directly on this type in 1943 instead of the more complicated Elektoboote. Way more could be operated by the same crews. Indeed the manpower for a single Type XXIII was enough to man six of them. There were no tubes, so the acoustic torpedoes were just released and self-propelled to target.


Captured Type XXIII by a Polish escort in 1945



Author’s illustration

⚙ Type XXIII specifications

Displacement 234t/258t surfaced/submerged
Dimensions 34.68 x 3.02 x 3.66m (113 ft 9+1⁄2 in x 9 ft 11 in x 12 ft)
Propulsion MWM RS134S 6-cyl. diesel 621 shp, AEG GU4463-8 EM 572 shp, BBC CCR188 ECM 35 shp
Speed 9.7 kn (18.0 km/h) surfaced, 12.5 kn (23 km/h) submerged
Range 2,600 nmi (4,800 km)/8 kn surfaced, 194 nmi (359 km)/4 kn submerged
Armament 2 bow torpedo tubes, no re